Though converting to TIFF does not mind at all.Įveryone says it just changes the wrapper, Victoria. And it seems that DNG converter does not like hi ISO images in particular. All this without ever ipening LR 6.īut agree, trying everything before upgrading as I hate subscriptions and I'm very comfortable with 6 and PS 6. Comparing current state of the technology. Which does work well with 8 and 16 bit tiffs from DPP. I said the Current Adobe DNG Converter has problems with Current R3 CR3 images. For example, in those screenshots you can see that the program on the left applies a lot of noise reduction by default, whereas LR doesn't. That question could be answered easily trying the same file through a current LR version with and without conversion.īear in mind though, that the default raw conversion in LR (or any other software) will not be an exact match for Canon's software, especially in more extreme lighting conditions. LR6 can't open the R3's files natively, so what's the CR3 that you're comparing against? DPP perhaps? The DNG converter just changes the wrapper around the raw data, so the issue is unlikely to be the DNG conversion. That said, it would be good to investigate to see where the problem is coming from, because it may be something you can solve without needing to upgrade. Technology moves on fast and your camera and LR version are a good few years apart. Saying Adobe's no good with R3 images is like saying the new fuel is no good because my 25 year car doesn't run well on it.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |